Friday, June 29, 2012

Court Overrules the Law of Excluded Middle

You'd think that any X is either a tax or not a tax. It's the law of excluded middle, right? The Supreme Court begs to differ. The penalty under Obamacare for not buying health insurance is a tax when the question is its constitutionality, but it is not a tax when the question is whether it violates the Anti-Injunction Act, which prohibits lawsuits against taxes before they take effect.

2 comments:

John Chrysostom said...

This isn't as big a contradiction as it appears at first. The Court has ruled historically that Congress's label determines whether something is a tax under the Anti-Injunction Act, while its function determines whether something is a tax under the Taxation Clause...

Sheldon Richman said...

Okay, the Court upheld Congress's repeal of the law of excluded middle.