What if we suspended disbelief and supposed that free markets could reasonably be expected to impoverish most people while benefiting only the few?Read it here.
Showing posts with label consequentialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consequentialism. Show all posts
Friday, January 30, 2015
TGIF: The Consequences of Liberty
Labels:
consequentialism,
deontology,
eudaimonism,
liberty,
poverty,
virtue ethics
Friday, December 27, 2013
TGIF: The Moral Case for Freedom Is the Practical Case for Freedom
So I, for one, don’t accept the division of the case for freedom into “the moral” and “the practical.” It’s a mistake, not to mention harmful to the cause.Read it here.
Monday, November 11, 2013
The Moral versus the Practical?
I've heard libertarians say they would be for freedom even if it had bad social consequences. For me, such a statement doesn't compute. Why not? Because morality is derived from the conditions under which rational social animals can flourish. What else could morality be? A set of arbitrary decrees from a deity?
For more, I highly recommend Roderick Long's article "Why Does Justice Have Good Consequences?"
For more, I highly recommend Roderick Long's article "Why Does Justice Have Good Consequences?"
Labels:
consequentialism,
deontology,
eudaimonism,
morality,
virtue ethics
Friday, February 24, 2012
TGIF: Do Ends Justify Means?
If “goods” are incommensurable, then one of them cannot be said to be “greater” than others. Thus acting for the “greater good” is without meaning.
Read TGIF here.
Labels:
consequentialism,
utilitarianism,
virtue ethics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
