George II was asked at his news conference this morning if he is thinking about attacking Iran. He said he respects the Iranian people and hopes the two countries can work out their differences diplomatically. (Blah, blah, blah. He speaks fluent boilerplate.) Yet he threatened further economic sanctions, which would exacerbate the hardship on the Iranians.
If he really wants to show his respect, he can formally apologize for the U.S. government's helping to overthrow an elected prime minister in 1953 and the restoration to power of the brutal Shah and his Savak secret police. Then he can promise not to bomb Iran under any circumstances. That would be a start.
On a related matter, Bush refused to comment on whether he approved of Israel's airstrike on a building in Syria allegedly holding nuclear equipment September 6. (The Syrian government says only an airspace violation occurred and no nuclear weapons were involved.) Why don't the American people have a right to know if Bush was complicit in the attack in any way, including the issuing of a green light, as U.S. presidents have done so many times in the past for Israel?
On the history of U.S. intervention in the Middle East, see this.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Come on! You know that there is no cause and effect involved. They attacked us because of they hate our freedoms! When Ron Paul talked about blow back, he was full of it. Sheesh.
(For those who can't figure it out, please note the sarcasm.)
Post a Comment