The opponents of the Bush wars and the accompanying expansion of government power have been disappointed countless times before. Just the other day the Democrats in Congress acquiesced in the Bush administration’s heavy-handed bid for the power to conduct warrantless eavesdropping on American citizens and residents in the name of fighting terrorism.The rest of my op-ed, "Casual Talk of War," is at The Future of Freedom Foundation website.We’ve come to expect Democratic cave-ins by now, but I confess I was disheartened to hear the presidential aspirant Sen. Barack Obama say he would invade Pakistan if he knew Osama bin Laden was there and President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan did nothing. Although Obama opposed the invasion of Iraq from the start, he evidently missed a key argument against that folly, for it would apply to the invasion of Pakistan too, namely: the U.S. government cannot throw its military might around the Muslim world without making things far worse than they are.
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Casual Talk of War
Labels:
blowback,
empire,
imperialism,
the state,
war,
war on terror
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
He's a politician. The only one who seems to stand for anything on a consistent basis Ron Paul. Obama is just trying to prove he is "tough" when it comes to terrorism.
Post a Comment