- David Beito on the state against blacks and civil liberties during World War I
- Stephen Davies on globalization and economic nationalism's path to World War I
- Burton Folsom on the myth of the robber barons and the Great Depression
- David Hart on pre-Marxist class theories and the private production of security in liberal thought
- Robert Higgs on liberty versus power and the costs of war
- Jeffrey Rogers Hummel on the American Revolution, Civil War, and economics of slavery
- Me on the Articles of Confederation versus the Constitution
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Friday, June 20, 2008
Friday, June 13, 2008
The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday struck a blow for the separation of powers and dealt the Bush administration a big setback by ruling that suspects held without charge at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the right to contest their imprisonment under the doctrine of habeas corpus.
Simply put, the Court held that the government may not keep anyone in custody indefinitely without having to justify its actions to a judge.
The rest of this week's TGIF, "The 'Stable Bulwark of Our Liberties,'" is at the Foundation for Economic Education website.This is an extremely important decision, and the unprincipled right wing is apoplectic. Thank goodness some people in power have resisted George II's fear-mongering.
Update -- Food for thought from the great Glenn Greenwald:
Three of the five Justices in the majority -- John Paul Stevens (age 88), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (age 75) and David Souter (age 68) -- are widely expected by court observers to retire or otherwise leave the Court in the first term of the next President. By contrast, the four judges who dissented -- Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts and Sam Alito -- are expected to stay right where they are for many years to come.
John McCain has identified Roberts and Alito as ideal justices of the type he would nominate, while Barack Obama has identified Stephen Breyer, David Souter and Ginsberg (all in the majority today). It's not hyperbole to say that, from Supreme Court appointments alone, our core constitutional protections could easily depend upon the outcome of the 2008 election.
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
An obituary is here. And here is a wonderful video lecture of hers on free trade and globalization.
Sunday, June 01, 2008
As if ending the invasion and occupation of a country that did Americans no harm -- acts that have spawned terrible hatred and a passion of vengeance -- would be anything like surrender. On the contrary, it would be liberating for Americans and Iraqis alike.