In a sweeping essay, Sheldon Richman explains why private property and free competition are superior to state-provided goods and services. He warns against granting "private" corporate monopolies, which are not true privatizations, but act as arms of the state. He adds that for many state activities, the best way to privatize is not to provide the service at all — as in the case of punishing victimless crimes, which no one should do. For legitimate services, he recommends a "homesteading" approach, in which stakeholders in a public service, such as a school, would receive shares in a new, independent corporation.See the full article.
Monday, October 01, 2012
My Case for Socializing the Means of Production
From Cato Unbound:
Labels:
competition,
freed market,
market process,
privatization
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment