Updated Dec. 14, 2015
It's about time someone challenged the phrase
radical Islamic terrorism. The most objectionable part is the word
radical since it is now popularly associated with aggression -- violence against innocents -- as an acceptable means to politico-religious ends.
But
nothing about the word radical implies approval of aggression or terrorism. Rather, the word signifies an approach that goes to the heart of a matter, or the person taking such an approach. Violence is a tactic that can be used in the service of radical ends but also conservative ends. A radical can be a pacifist, a terrorist, or one who believes that violence is appropriate only in the defense of innocent life. There's simply no necessary connection between radicalism and aggression.