Friday, June 18, 2010
Cato Unbound Response
My Cato Unbound response to David Bernstein is here.
Labels:
Civil Rights Act of 1964,
private property,
racism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Proudly delegitimizing the state since 2005
"Aye, free! Free as a tethered ass!" —W.S. Gilbert
"All the affairs of men should be managed by individuals or voluntary associations, and . . . the State should be abolished." —Benjamin Tucker
"You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." —James Madison
"Fat chance." —Sheldon Richman
—Henry David Thoreau
"Free association . . . the only true form of society."
—Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
2 comments:
Well done, Sheldon.
A related issue that comes to mind is time-preference. Americans, and I think this is true of many libertarians too, tend to be very impatient, and thus may be more receptive to heavy-handed responses to (admitted) injustices than they otherwise would be. Stroke of the pen, law of the land. If we went the route you suggested, it would have taken longer to undo Jim Crow, but I believe the overall long-term outcome would have been far better.
In this case, where there was an obvious injustice and the remedy was not altogether unreasonable, the above point might not seem critical. But this same mindset carries over into every alleged crisis, including ones which the Feds have no business attempting to remedy and, in fact, they may have contributed greatly to or been responsible for. (Caveat, if Feds were responsible, they should remedy by undoing their mischief to the extent possible). So the same mindset that celebrates the gains coming out of the Civil Rights Act also provides the popular support for all sorts of liberty-destroying wars, both foreign and domestic. It fosters a mentality of dependence on government in general, rather than the workings of a free society.
On a related note, though more specific to the CRA, one might also question to what degree that act led to the Great Society laws (welfare expansion) which have done so much harm to the poor, especially urban blacks.
On the one hand, one might say that this is a separate matter, but looking at it from a dialectical perspective, perhaps it is part and parcel of the whole enterprise.
Post a Comment