tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post4419858396650977827..comments2024-03-26T04:21:43.535-05:00Comments on Free Association: TGIF: Ownership and IdeasSheldon Richmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15672237234580563637noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-88352584488556639122014-09-17T11:40:55.379-05:002014-09-17T11:40:55.379-05:00Tu quoque is Latin for "you, too." As in...Tu quoque is Latin for "you, too." As in "you believe intellectual monopoly violates property rights; your writings have copyrights; hence, your statement is incorrect."<br /><br />A pathological projection would be an uncovered cough or sneeze.<br /><br />If you have reason to believe you have the intellectual property necessary to refute this particular essay of Richman's which claims that grants of intellectual of monopoly violate property rights or to acknowledge and excuse such violations, please do so.thombroganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01594541646576425696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-68342352259988240052014-09-17T11:05:02.215-05:002014-09-17T11:05:02.215-05:00It is pathological projection to say "tu quoq...It is pathological projection to say "tu quoque" (my problem), when a rational person would say "self-contradiction" (your problem).<br /><br />If you have a question, ask it. If you have a response referencing the original, make it.<br /><br />Terry Hulseyhttp://terryhulsey.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-37521476807325980792014-09-17T10:34:22.378-05:002014-09-17T10:34:22.378-05:00Are you sure you want violently typed logical fals...Are you sure you want violently typed logical falsehoods (many of which I named in my, er, non-address) to be your final answer as to why you believe violating property rights in the name of intellectual monopoly is a just practice?thombroganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01594541646576425696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-13152091506046902722014-09-17T08:36:10.604-05:002014-09-17T08:36:10.604-05:00I can't answer the formatting complaint, and a...I can't answer the formatting complaint, and as for the... oh wait, you weren't able to address anything else.Terry Hulseyhttp://terryhulsey.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-71063987118215955612014-09-17T07:14:32.248-05:002014-09-17T07:14:32.248-05:00Would you be able to write your argument in a way ...Would you be able to write your argument in a way that doesn't use certain logical fallacies ("tu quoque," "equivocation," "ad hominem accusative," and "ad hominem circumstancial" for starters...) and doesn't make unprovable assertions that monopolist-authorized goods would make the same profits as independently produced goods?<br /><br />Which reader is supposed to suffer through a poorly-formatted screed of denunciations and insults and say: "Violating property rights to benefit monopolists is a <i>great</i> idea!" ?thombroganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01594541646576425696noreply@blogger.com