tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post2571592591786005511..comments2024-03-26T04:21:43.535-05:00Comments on Free Association: Ahistorical "Libertarian" WarmongersSheldon Richmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15672237234580563637noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-18251522622030534122007-07-23T15:46:00.000-05:002007-07-23T15:46:00.000-05:001. Outright stupidity2. Willful ignorance3. Fel...1. Outright stupidity<BR/><BR/>2. Willful ignorance<BR/><BR/>3. Fellatious obsequiousness<BR/><BR/>4. Some combination of the above.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-1921123201934280772007-07-21T04:50:00.000-05:002007-07-21T04:50:00.000-05:00How could Randy Barnett not know that "War is the ...How could Randy Barnett not know that "War is the Health of the State," as Randolph Bourne put it so well.Sheldon Richmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15672237234580563637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-18924712923286185812007-07-20T20:01:00.000-05:002007-07-20T20:01:00.000-05:00Sheldon, I got as far as I could through it -- abo...Sheldon, I got as far as I could through it -- about 2/3 of the way -- before I could stand it no more. Barnett's entire argument was predicated on premises I find invalid. I pity you, that you had to suffer all the way through it as a matter of professionalism.<BR/><BR/>That "Rudy-worship" was something else. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, but my opinion is that public subscription to fuhrerprinzip disqualifies one as a "libertarian," whatever that is.<BR/><BR/>Needless to say, I agree with your every point of criticism. Equally needless to say, Randy Barnett is no Sheldon Richman!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-18671988057024027692007-07-20T13:25:00.000-05:002007-07-20T13:25:00.000-05:00Barnett. It could be a job application. Yes, you s...Barnett. It could be a job application. Yes, you should read it, James.Sheldon Richmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15672237234580563637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-84739373032168936622007-07-20T11:50:00.000-05:002007-07-20T11:50:00.000-05:00Who, Raimondo or Barnett? Methinks you mean Barne...Who, Raimondo or Barnett? Methinks you mean Barnett. Do I actually have to read Barnett's tripe? As for kissing the posterior of a certain Italian-American, might it be an insurance policy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-57518940294066740352007-07-19T20:18:00.000-05:002007-07-19T20:18:00.000-05:00What was he up to with the Giuliani a**-kissing an...What was he up to with the Giuliani a**-kissing anyway?Sheldon Richmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15672237234580563637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-62895607754484934262007-07-19T11:57:00.000-05:002007-07-19T11:57:00.000-05:00Raimondo, similarly skewering Barnett, posted his ...Raimondo, similarly skewering Barnett, posted his best article in months.<BR/><BR/>The neocon propaganda machine is burning the midnight oil. Barnett is probably a recent Operation Mockingbird acquisition.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-70656125206196342592007-07-18T18:05:00.000-05:002007-07-18T18:05:00.000-05:00Thanks. Nice to get off the tax issue. :-)Thanks. Nice to get off the tax issue. :-)Sheldon Richmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15672237234580563637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20077444.post-31390224181004949512007-07-18T17:34:00.000-05:002007-07-18T17:34:00.000-05:00AMEN!AMEN!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com